събота, 20 април 2013 г.

The New York Times


The New York Times


April 19, 2013

Beautiful and Damned

By PENELOPE GREEN
Z
A Novel of Zelda Fitzgerald
By Therese Anne Fowler
375 pp. St. Martin’s Press. $25.99.
They were, arguably, the first celebrity couple of the modern age, Jazz-era avatars running wild in a new century. She was a precocious, spoiled Southern belle and bad girl; he was a Midwesterner and Princeton dropout who had turned his experience into the novel “This Side of Paradise.” In the 1920s, Scott and Zelda Fitzgerald careered through New York City and Great Neck, Paris and the South of France, leaving in their wake a trail of splintered Champagne glasses and glittering bons mots. Their tragic, slow-motion falls — she to madness and a series of mental institutions, he to alcohol and an indifferent public — seemed inevitable, and drawn from the pages of one of his novels. She was reckless to the point of oddity; he always drank like a professional, collapsing the arc from charming to churlish early on.
But theirs was surely one of the most fascinating literary and romantic partnerships, symbiotic to the point of cannibalism, with Scott drawing freely from Zelda’s diaries, letters and experiences (including her treatment for mental illness) for his own work. In a review of “The Beautiful and Damned” coyly commissioned as a publicity stunt by The New York Tribune, Zelda wrote, “Mr. Fitzgerald — I believe that is how he spells his name — seems to believe that plagiarism begins at home.” But Zelda wrote stories, too — some were published under both their names (better for sales) in popular magazines of the day — as well as plays and, later, a thinly veiled autobiographical novel called “Save Me the Waltz.” This she banged out in two months during a stay at a Maryland mental institution, enraging her husband not only because of the speed with which she produced the book, but also because its themes — a married couple in free-fall; a wife hospitalized — were those of the novel he was trying to write (“Tender Is the Night”), and she’d beat him to the finish line.
The Fitzgeralds turned out so much copy about themselves, fictional and otherwise, that biographers have been able to serve them up every which way — with Zelda providing a particularly juicy and complex meal. Feminist icon? Check. Infamous nag and emasculator? Check (see Hemingway’s “Moveable Feast” for a singularly vicious rendition). As it happens, Zelda fits quite nicely into the pantheon of difficult and intriguing women like Frances Farmer, Marilyn Monroe and even Elizabeth Wurtzel.
Was she an artist in her own right, or just artistic? (“Mr. Fitzgerald is a novelist and Mrs. Fitzgerald is a novelty,” Ring Lardner wrote.) Was she really schizophrenic? Did she suffer from borderline personality disorder, or was she bipolar, as contemporary psychiatrists like Peter Kramer have argued? Was she truly mentally ill, or a victim of a controlling, alcoholic husband and a patriarchal society? Perhaps her treatment did her in; her maladies were diagnosed in psychiatry’s infancy and subjected, as so many were in those days, to blunt instruments — insulin, electroshock therapy and extended stays in mental institutions.
What is indisputable is that she was a personality, a woman with her own very distinct voice — passionate, sometimes chaotically allusive, always vivid. Zelda has been catnip to writers for decades, beginning in 1970 with Nancy Milford’s excellent and exhaustive biography. In 2007, “Alabama Song,” a French novel about Zelda, won the Prix Goncourt, France’s biggest literary prize.
And so we now have this year’s entry, “Z: A Novel of Zelda Fitzgerald,” by Therese Anne Fowler, which attempts to give new voice to a woman whose voice was hardly muffled. (It arrives amid a Fitzgerald flutter. Out in May, “Beautiful Fools,” by R. Clifton Spargo, is a novel that imagines the couple’s last trip together, to Cuba, the year before Scott died of a heart attack in his girlfriend’s Hollywood apartment. Baz Luhrmann’s 3-D movie “The Great Gatsby,” with Leonardo DiCaprio as you-know-who, opens next month.)
Despite its racy, one-letter title, “Z” is a rather tame affair, dutiful but somehow distant, as is sometimes the case when one’s material is so well-known. Fowler has determinedly imagined her own dialogue and written her own versions of Zelda’s letters, and the voice she has given her is that of a perky helpmeet to her husband: a can-do girl saddled with a hopeless drunk, jollying him along, deflecting his alcoholic rage and attendant social embarrassments with quips delivered over her shoulder as she leads him away from the bar or the dinner table.
The pivotal plot point is the bromance between Hemingway and Fitzgerald. Although Zelda was never universally beloved (Rebecca West recalled how she “flapped her arms and looked very uncouth as she talked about her ballet ambitions”), Hemingway took a particular dislike to her, and Fowler imagines cause and effect with a scene in which a boorish Hemingway comes on to Zelda and she rebuffs him, insulting his manliness.
While the reader can enjoy a quick bit of literary tourism along the way — “At a Left Bank bar called the Dingo a day or two later, we had just taken a table when Ezra Pound spotted us and came strolling over” — you feel hustled toward the plot’s climax, and then just as quickly hustled away from it, toward the twin declines of both Zelda and Scott, which are rendered in passages like this one:
“Blackness had poured into my head like hot tar. What came afterward is mostly lost to me, though here’s what I’ve since been told:
“Scott was out of money, so I moved to a grim sanitarium called Sheppard Pratt Hospital in May of ’35. The doctors tried to thin that tar with insulin therapy, or scare it off with electroshock treatments, or blast it from me with pentylenetetrazol, a compound that provokes brain seizures. Still the blackness remained, and I began to see and converse with God.”
This Zelda is brisk and rather incurious, and she hurries the reader along, with no stopping for self-analysis. She is a dutiful mother who mops up her bilious daughter, a woman you could never imagine saying of that same child, “I hope it’s beautiful and a fool,” to quote one of Zelda’s more famous lines. When, in “Z,” she falls in love with a French pilot, she notes blandly, “Everything Scott said rankled; everything Édouard said reigned. I was a woman possessed.” The last time she sees him, Zelda says of her husband, “What I thought as I saw him being wheeled off was He’s such an extraordinarily brilliant person that it would be terrible if he let himself do nothing in the end.”
Indeed. In the book’s afterword, Fowler describes Zelda’s death eight years after her husband’s, in a fire that tore through the mental hospital she’d checked herself into. “Z” leaves us with the last line of “The Great Gatsby,” the epitaph written on Scott and Zelda’s tombstone, the one we can all recite by heart:
“So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.”
It’s a bummer, not because the line is so sad or by now even something of a cliché, but because it reminds you of the precision and delight of Fitzgerald’s words, the remarkable voices of the real Zelda and Scott — and the much flatter sound of Z and her man.
Penelope Green is a reporter for the Home section of The Times.

понеделник, 4 февруари 2013 г.

Essay Organization


Organizing an Essay

Some basic guidelines


The best time to think about how to organize your paper is during the pre-writing stage, not the writing or revising stage. A well-thought-out plan can save you from having to do a lot of reorganizing when the first draft is completed. Moreover, it allows you to pay more attention to sentence-level issues when you sit down to write your paper.
When you begin planning, ask the following questions: What type of essay am I going to be writing? Does it belong to a specific genre? In university, you may be asked to write, say, a book review, a lab report, a document study, or a compare-and-contrast essay. Knowing the patterns of reasoning associated with a genre can help you to structure your essay.
For example, book reviews typically begin with a summary of the book you’re reviewing. They then often move on to a critical discussion of the book’s strengths and weaknesses. They may conclude with an overall assessment of the value of the book. These typical features of a book review lead you to consider dividing your outline into three parts: (1) summary; (2) discussion of strengths and weaknesses; (3) overall evaluation. The second and most substantial part will likely break down into two sub-parts. It is up to you to decide the order of the two subparts—whether to analyze strengths or weaknesses first. And of course it will be up to you to come up with actual strengths and weaknesses.
Be aware that genres are not fixed. Different professors will define the features of a genre differently. Read the assignment question carefully for guidance.
Understanding genre can take you only so far. Most university essays are argumentative, and there is no set pattern for the shape of an argumentative essay. The simple three-point essay taught in high school is far too restrictive for the complexities of most university assignments. You must be ready to come up with whatever essay structure helps you to convince your reader of the validity of your position. In other words, you must be flexible, and you must rely on your wits. Each essay presents a fresh problem.
Avoiding a common pitfall
Though there are no easy formulas for generating an outline, you can avoid one of the most common pitfalls in student papers by remembering this simple principle: the structure of an essay should not be determined by the structure of its source material. For example, an essay on an historical period should not necessarily follow the chronology of events from that period. Similarly, a well-constructed essay about a literary work does not usually progress in parallel with the plot. Your obligation is to advance your argument, not to reproduce the plot.
If your essay is not well structured, then its overall weaknesses will show through in the individual paragraphs. Consider the following two paragraphs from two different English essays, both arguing that despite Hamlet’s highly developed moral nature he becomes morally compromised in the course of the play:
(a) In Act 3, Scene 4, Polonius hides behind an arras in Gertrude’s chamber in order to spy on Hamlet at the bidding of the king. Detecting something stirring, Hamlet draws his sword and kills Polonius, thinking he has killed Claudius. Gertrude exclaims, “O, what a rash and bloody deed is this!” (28), and her words mark the turning point in Hamlet’s moral decline. Now Hamlet has blood on his hands, and the blood of the wrong person. But rather than engage in self-criticism, Hamlet immediately turns his mother’s words against her: “A bloody deed — almost as bad, good Mother, as kill a king, and marry with his brother” (29-30). One of Hamlet’s most serious shortcomings is his unfair treatment of women. He often accuses them of sins they could not have committed. It is doubtful that Gertrude even knows Claudius killed her previous husband. Hamlet goes on to ask Gertrude to compare the image of the two kings, old Hamlet and Claudius. In Hamlet’s words, old Hamlet has “Hyperion’s curls,” the front of Jove,” and “an eye like Mars” (57-58). Despite Hamlet’s unfair treatment of women, he is motivated by one of his better qualities: his idealism.
2
(b) One of Hamlet’s most serious moral shortcomings is his unfair treatment of women. In Act 3, Scene 1, he denies to Ophelia ever having expressed his love for her, using his feigned madness as cover for his cruelty. Though his rantings may be an act, they cannot hide his obsessive anger at one particular woman: his mother. He counsels Ophelia to “marry a fool, for wise men know well enough what monsters you make of them” (139-41), thus blaming her in advance for the sin of adultery. The logic is plain: if Hamlet’s mother made a cuckold out of Hamlet’s father, then all women are capable of doing the same and therefore share the blame. The fact that Gertrude’s hasty remarriage does not actually constitute adultery only underscores Hamlet’s tendency to find in women faults that do not exist. In Act 3, Scene 4, he goes as far as to suggest that Gertrude shared responsibility in the murder of Hamlet’s father (29-30). By condemning women for actions they did not commit, Hamlet is doing just what he accuses Guildenstern of doing to him: he is plucking out the “heart” of their “mystery” (3.2.372-74).
The second of these two paragraphs is much stronger, largely because it is not plot-driven. It makes a well-defined point about Hamlet’s moral nature and sticks to that point throughout the paragraph. Notice that the paragraph jumps from one scene to another as is necessary, but the logic of the argument moves along a steady path. At any given point in your essays, you will want to leave yourself free to go wherever you need to in your source material. Your only obligation is to further your argument. Paragraph (a) sticks closely to the narrative thread of Act 3, Scene 4, and as a result the paragraph makes several different points with no clear focus.
What does an essay outline look like?
Most essay outlines will never be handed in. They are meant to serve you and no one else. Occasionally, your professor will ask you to hand in an outline weeks prior to handing in your paper. Usually, the point is to ensure that you are on the right track. Nevertheless, when you produce your outline, you should follow certain basic principles. Here is an example of an outline for an essay on Hamlet:
thesis: Despite Hamlet’s highly developed moral nature, he becomes morally compromised while delaying his revenge.
I. Introduction: Hamlet’s father asks Hamlet not only to seek vengeance but also to keep his mind untainted.
II. Hamlet has a highly developed moral nature.
A. Hamlet is idealistic.
B. Hamlet is aware of his own faults, whereas others are self-satisfied.
C. Hamlet does not want to take revenge without grounds for acting.
III. Hamlet becomes morally compromised while delaying.
A. The turning point in Hamlet’s moral decline is his killing of Polonius.
B. Hamlet’s moral decline continues when he sends Rosencrantz and Guildenstern to their death.
C. Hamlet already began his moral decline before the turning point in the play, the killing of Polonius.
1. Hamlet treats women badly.
2. Hamlet criticizes others in the play for acting falsely to get ahead, but in adopting the disguise of madness he, too, is presenting a false face to the world.
IV. Though Hamlet becomes more compromised the longer he delays, killing the king would have been a morally questionable act.
V. Conclusion: The play Hamlet questions the adequacy of a system of ethics based on honour and revenge.
This is an example of a sentence outline. Another kind of outline is the topic outline. It consists of fragments rather than full sentences. Topic outlines are more open-ended than sentence outlines: they leave much of the working out of the argument for the writing stage.
When should I begin putting together a plan?
The earlier you begin planning, the better. It is usually a mistake to do all of your research and note-taking before beginning to draw up an outline. Of course, you will have to do some reading and weighing of evidence before you start to plan. But as a potential argument begins to
3
take shape in your mind, you may start to formalize your thoughts in the form of a tentative plan. You will be much more efficient in your reading and your research if you have some idea of where your argument is headed. You can then search for evidence for the points in your tentative plan while you are reading and researching. As you gather evidence, those points that still lack evidence should guide you in your research. Remember, though, that your plan may need to be modified as you critically evaluate your evidence.
Some techniques for integrating note-taking and planning
Though convenient, the common method of jotting down your notes consecutively on paper is far from ideal. The problem is that your points remain fixed on paper. Here are three alternatives that provide greater flexibility:
method 1: index cards
When you are researching, write down every idea, fact, quotation, or paraphrase on a separate index card. Small (5” by 3”) cards are easiest to work with. When you’ve collected all your cards, reshuffle them into the best possible order, and you have an outline, though you will undoubtedly want to reduce this outline to the essential points should you transcribe it to paper.
A useful alternative involves using both white and coloured cards. When you come up with a point that you think may be one of the main points in your outline, write it at the top of a coloured card. Put each supporting note on a separate white card, using as much of the card as necessary. When you feel ready, arrange the coloured cards into a workable plan. Some of the points may not fit in. If so, either modify the plan or leave these points out. You may need to fill gaps by creating new cards. You can shuffle your supporting material into the plan by placing each of the white cards behind the point it helps support.
method 2: the computer
A different way of moving your notes around is to use the computer. You can collect your points consecutively, just as you would on paper. You can then sort your ideas when you are ready to start planning. Take advantage of “outline view” in Word, which makes it easy for you to arrange your points hierarchically. This method is fine so long as you don’t mind being tied to your computer from the first stage of the writing process to the last. Some people prefer to keep their planning low-tech.
method 3: the circle method
This method is designed to get your ideas onto a single page, where you can see them all at once. When you have an idea, write it down on paper and draw a circle around it. When you have an idea which supports another idea, do the same, but connect the two circles with a line. Supporting source material can be represented concisely by a page reference inside a circle. The advantage of the circle method is that you can see at a glance how things tie together; the disadvantage is that there is a limit to how much material you can cram onto a page.
Here is part of a circle diagram: H has a highly developed moral nature H is idealisticH is aware of his faults H seeks grounds for acting
4
What is a reverse outline?
When you have completed your first draft, and you think your paper can be better organized, consider using a reverse outline. Reverse outlines are simple to create. Just read through your essay, and every time you make a new point, summarize it in the margin. If the essay is reasonably well-organized, you should have one point in the margin for each paragraph, and your points read out in order should form a coherent argument. You might, however, discover that some of your points are repeated at various places in your essay. Other points may be out of place, and still other key points may not appear at all. Think of all these points as the ingredients of an improved outline which you now must create. Use this new outline to cut and paste the sentences into a revised version of your essay, consolidating points that appear in several parts of your essay while eliminating repetition and creating smooth transitions where necessary.
You can improve even the most carefully planned essay by creating a reverse outline after completing your first draft. The process of revision should be as much about organization as it is about style.
How much of my time should I put into planning?
It is self-evident that a well-planned paper is going to be better organized than a paper that was not planned out. Thinking carefully about how you are going to argue your paper and preparing an outline can only add to the quality of your final product. Nevertheless, some people find it more helpful than others to plan. Those who are good at coming up with ideas but find writing difficult often benefit from planning. By contrast, those who have trouble generating ideas but find writing easy may benefit from starting to write early. Putting pen to paper (or typing away at the keyboard) may be just what is needed to get the ideas to flow.
You have to find out for yourself what works best for you, though it is fair to say that at least some planning is always a good idea. Think about whether your current practices are serving you well. You know you’re planning too little if the first draft of your essays is always a disorganized mess, and you have to spend a disproportionate amount of time creating reverse outlines and cutting and pasting material. You know you’re planning too much if you always find yourself writing your paper a day before it’s due after spending weeks doing research and devising elaborate plans.
Be aware of the implications of planning too little or too much.
Planning provides the following advantages:
• helps you to produce a logical and orderly argument that your readers can follow
• helps you to produce an economical paper by allowing you to spot repetition
• helps you to produce a thorough paper by making it easier for you to notice whether you have left anything out
• makes drafting the paper easier by allowing you to concentrate on writing issues such as grammar, word choice, and clarity
Overplanning poses the following risks:
• doesn’t leave you enough time to write and revise
• leads you to produce papers that try to cover too much ground at the expense of analytic depth
• can result in a writing style that lacks spontaneity and ease
• does not provide enough opportunity to discover new ideas in the process of writing
Prepared by Jerry Plotnick, Director of the University College Writing Centre Over 50 other files offering advice about university writing are available at www.writing.utoronto.ca

неделя, 30 декември 2012 г.

John Grisham


John Grisham: By the Book

Published: October 25, 2012

The author, most recently, of “The Racketeer” wishes President Obama would read “Fifty Shades of Grey”: “Maybe it would loosen him up a bit.”


John Grisham

What book is on your night stand now?
There are a dozen. I’m halfway through “All the King’s Men,” by Robert Penn Warren. I haven’t read it since college.
When and where do you like to read?
I usually read at night, in the bed, before falling asleep. In the summertime, I love to read on the porch in a rocker under a ceiling fan.
What was the last truly great book you read?
The word “great” gets tossed around too easily. The last book that kept me completely engrossed while delivering a powerful story was “Life After Death,” by Damien Echols. He spent 18 years on death row in Arkansas for crimes he didn’t commit, and was released last year. Though he’s innocent, the state refuses to exonerate him.
Are you a fiction or a nonfiction person? What’s your favorite literary genre: Any guilty pleasures? Do you like to read other legal thrillers?
I read much more nonfiction, usually while researching the next novel. Books and studies on unlawful convictions, unfair trials, overcrowded prisons, prosecutorial misconduct, etc. I read most of the other legal thrillers on the best-seller lists to keep up with the competition.
Who are your favorites among the competition?
When “Presumed Innocent” was published in 1987, I was struggling to finish my first novel. Scott Turow re-energized the legal suspense genre with that book, and it inspired me to keep plugging along. Scott is still the best lawyer-novelist.
What book had the greatest impact on you? What book made you want to write?
“The Grapes of Wrath,” by John Steinbeck. I read it when I was a senior in high school and was struck by its clarity and power. I’m not sure if it inspired me to write, but I do recall thinking, “I wish I could write as clearly as John Steinbeck.”
If you could require the president to read one book, what would it be?
“Fifty Shades of Grey.” Why should he miss all the fun? Plus, it might loosen him up a bit.
What are your reading habits? Paper or electronic? Do you take notes?
My wife gave me a Kindle Fire for Christmas and I am having great fun with it. I’m not sure I am reading more, but I am certainly ordering more. But there is always a stack of hardbacks on the night stand waiting to be read. I’ll start three a week and try to finish one. I’m too lazy to take notes.
Do you prefer a book that makes you laugh or makes you cry? One that teaches you something or one that distracts you?
I love humor and for this reason I’ve always enjoyed Mark Twain. He was without a doubt the funniest writer who ever picked up a pen. I’m not sure I ever cried while reading a book.
What were your favorite books as a child? Do you have a favorite character or hero from one of those books? Is there one book you wish all children would read?
As a small child I loved Dr. Seuss. Later, the Hardy Boys and Chip Hilton. Then I discovered Mark Twain with Tom Sawyer and Huck Finn. Tom Sawyer is still my all-time favorite literary hero.
Disappointing, overrated, just not good: What book did you feel as if you were supposed to like, and didn’t? Do you remember the last book you put down without finishing?
I tried a couple of times to read “The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo,” but never finished it.
If you could meet any writer, dead or alive, who would it be? What would you want to know? Have you ever written to an author?
Mark Twain, but when he was 40, not 70. He was a pretty nasty old man. I’m not sure what I would ask Mark Twain, but I’m pretty sure it would not be for investment advice. I wrote him a letter when I was a kid but never heard back. What an ass.
Which of the books you’ve written is your favorite? Your favorite character? What’s your favorite movie adaptation of a book you’ve written?
My first book, “A Time to Kill,” is still my favorite, and Jake Brigance is still my favorite character. The best adaptation was “The Rainmaker,” with Francis Ford Coppola.
If you could choose among your novels the next to be adapted into a movie, which would it be and why?
Who doesn’t love a good movie? For this reason, I would enjoy seeing all of my books adapted to film. There are currently three or four “in production” — not sure what that means but I suspect it means little is happening. Gone are the days when I sold the film rights for a nice check, then sat back and waited 18 months for the movie. Long gone.
“Calico Joe” is being developed by Chris Columbus, who wrote a great script and plans to direct. It appears to be a fast track and should be fun to watch. My involvement is always limited, as it should be. I know nothing about making movies and have no desire to learn.
What’s the best book about the law ever written?
“To Kill a Mockingbird.”
The best book about baseball?
“Bang the Drum Slowly,” by Mark Harris.
What’s the one book you wish someone else would write?
My next legal thriller. No — make that my next five.
You’ve traveled all around the country for your book tours. Do you have a particular favorite place to visit as an author? A city that’s especially welcoming to writers?
I’ve visited several death rows doing research, and they are fascinating. Prisons in general give me inspiration for stories and characters. My next book is about a lawyer in prison, and I went to visit a couple. Rich stuff.
I don’t understand how anyone can write in a city. I live in the boondocks where it’s quiet and peaceful and when the words are slow I go for long walks through the hills. To my recollection, I’ve never written a single word of a novel in town.
What do you plan to read next?
I have a friend who is an obnoxious Yankee fan (aren’t they all?) and he’s hounding me to read the latest biographies of Mantle and Maris: “The Last Boy: Mickey Mantle and the End of America’s Childhood,” and “Roger Maris, Baseball’s Reluctant Hero.” I’ll give ’em a shot.
A version of this article appeared in print on October 28, 2012, on page BR7 of the Sunday Book Review with the headline: By the Book: John Grisham.

Young Goodman Brown by Nathaniel Nawthorne

http://www.columbia.edu/itc/english/f1124y-001/resources/Young_Goodman_Brown.pdf